Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_3" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ). We tell you about cash you can claim every week!ĬAPTCHACommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
The plaintiffs allege that the Arm & Hammer manufacturer has earned millions due to its unfair and deceptive practices. “Defendant will be unjustly enriched if it is allowed to retain such funds, and each Class member is entitled to an amount equal to the amount they enriched Defendant and for which Defendant has been unjustly enriched,” the lawsuit states. The plaintiffs allege that the Arm & Hammer manufacturer violated several state laws in addition to federal claims of negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. Defendant has been unjustly enriched as a result of selling the Products in disproportionately large containers compared to the volume of the actual product contained therein,” the lawsuit claims.
#Arm and hammer detergent skin
Arm and Hammer Liquid Laundry 189oz Sensitive Skin 189-oz HE Laundry Detergent.
#Arm and hammer detergent plus
“Defendant has deceived Plaintiffs and other consumers nationwide by mischaracterizing the volume of the Products. Arm & Hammer Plus OxiClean Odor Blaster 201.6oz 201.6-oz Fresh Burst HE Laundry Detergent. The Arm & Hammer lawsuit claims that Riedel was misled by the oversized bottles and suffered monetary loss because of the deceptive, false, and misleading business practices of the defendant. According to the plaintiff, there’s no way a reasonable consumer could know that the laundry container wasn’t filled to capacity. Riedel says he bought 61 ounces of Arm & Hammer laundry detergent for $16 because he relied on the size of the packaging at the time of purchase. “There is no practical reason to package the Products in over-sized containers other than to mislead consumers as to the actual volume of the Products being purchased,” the class action lawsuit states.Īs a result of Arm & Hammer’s alleged fraudulent business practices, customers pay a premium price for the laundry detergent compared to other products on the market, according to the plaintiffs. Lead plaintiffs Vincent Riedel and Yang Shen say that Church & Dwight intentionally package Arm & Hammer laundry detergent in large, non-transparent plastic bottles to make it appear as if consumers are buying more than they actually do.
The manufacturer of Arm & Hammer faces a class action lawsuit over claims that its liquid laundry detergent containers are 14 percent empty space.
0 kommentar(er)
